Lodgement of the Register of Registrable Controllers with ACRA



Lodgement of the Register of Registrable Controllers with ACRA

A photo of the Parliament building of Singapore

Date Published: 22 July 2020 

Authors: Bill Jamieson and Sean Tan.



Keeping in line with international practices, the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (“ACRA”) of Singapore will require all companies incorporated in Singapore, foreign companies and limited liability partnerships incorporated or registered in Singapore (“LLPs”) to file and maintain a Register of Registrable Controllers (“RORC”) with them. Initially scheduled to come into effect in May 2020, this requirement has been deferred to July 2020 in light of the Covid-19 pandemic. Certain entities such as listed companies and Singapore financial institutions, and their respective wholly-owned subsidiaries, are exempted from the RORC requirement.

The RORC is a private register that can be kept by the company, foreign company and LLP at its registered office, or at the registered office of its registered filing agent (“RFA”). While the RORC is not made available to the public, it is available for inspection upon the request of public agencies, such as law enforcement agencies in Singapore and the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore.

All companies, foreign companies and LLPs that are not exempted shall now lodge information in their RORC with ACRA. This can be done through ACRA’s business filing portal, BizFile. While the Singapore-incorporated companies, foreign companies and LLPs are required to continue maintaining the RORC at their registered office any changes or updates to the information in their RORC must be reflected with the lodged RORC with ACRA within two business days. While the information lodged on the RORC with the ACRA will still not be available to members of the public, the information on the RORC will now be accessible online by public agencies in Singapore.

RFAs may be engaged to lodge the RORC information with ACRA on behalf of the company, foreign company or LLP. RFAs must have first been authorised by their clients to lodge and update the RORC information in their stead.

The information required to the lodged with the RORC with ACRA is set out below.


For registrable Controllers who are individuals, the prescribed particulars include:

  1. Full name;
  2. Aliases, if any;
  3. Residential address;
  4. Nationality;
  5. Identity card number or passport number;
  6. Date of birth;
  7. Date on which the individual became a registrable Controller of the Singapore Relevant Entity; and
  8. Date on which the individual ceased to be a registrable Controller of the Singapore Relevant Entity.


For registrable Controllers that are corporate entities, the prescribed particulars include:

  1. Name;
  2. Unique entity number issued by the Registrar of Companies, if any;
  3. Address of registered office;
  4. Legal form of the registrable corporate Controller;
  5. Jurisdiction where, and statute under which, the registrable Controller is formed or incorporated;
  6. Name of the corporate entity register of the jurisdiction in which the registrable corporate Controller is formed or incorporated, if applicable;
  7. Identification number or registration number of the registrable corporate Controller on the corporate entity register of the jurisdiction where the registrable corporate Controller is formed or incorporated, if applicable;
  8. Date on which the entity became a registrable corporate Controller of the Singapore Relevant Entity; and
  9. Date on which the entity ceased to be a registrable corporate Controller of the Singapore Relevant Entity.


If there is an error in the RORC information lodged with the ACRA, the lodger can update the information using the same transaction or lodge a Notification of Error with ACRA if it is due to a typographical error.

No fees are incurred for the lodgement of RORC information with ACRA.

Disclaimer: This update is provided to you for general information and should not be relied upon as legal advice.


CNPLaw’s Corporate Governance, Compliance and Regulatory Lawyer

Bill Jamieson is a Partner at CNPLaw LLP. Bill is an English lawyer who is also registered to practise Singapore law in the areas of corporate law, banking and finance and securities laws. He enjoys working in the diverse and dynamic Asian market and helping his clients to achieve their goals.

    Bill’s practice focuses on corporate financing transactions, investment funds, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, and employment law matters. His experience includes 10 years in the City of London and over 20 years in Asia. Before joining CNP, Bill was a partner in a well-known international law firm. He is recommended lawyer for Corporate and M&A, Banking and Finance, Investment Funds and Labour and Employment in Legal 500 Asia Pacific 2021. Bill is one of the firm’s contacts for Interlaw, a network of independent full-service corporate law firms ranked by Chambers and Partners in its highest category, “Elite”, amongst all global law firm networks.

    Sean Tan Associate at CNPLaw

      Sean is an Associate in the Corporate Finance practice group. His main areas of practice include corporate finance, equity capital markets, and general corporate advisory. He has been involved in preparing commercial agreements and general corporate contracts.

      We advise both private and public (whether listed or non-listed) companies on corporate governance and compliance issues to help them acclimatise and thrive in a regulatory landscape that is becoming increasingly complex.

      Besides providing general advice on director duties and corporate secretarial matters, we help our clients better appreciate the licensing and compliance regimes applicable to the industries that they operate in and review our clients’ administrative and operational procedures for consistency with industry standards.

      We provide legal advisory services to fund managers, investors and investee companies in relation to both open-end funds and closed-end funds that deal with a variety of asset classes and employ different investment strategies including: Hedge Funds, Private Equity Funds, Mutual Funds, Venture Capital (VC) Funds, Commodity Funds and Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs).

      Every business involves an amalgam of various stakeholders, such as investors, shareholders and directors. Ideally, each of these stakeholders should have a common vision of what is best for the company. However, this is rarely the case when individual interests are factored into the equation.

      Stakeholder conflicts (regarding issues such as breaches of fiduciary dutiesderivative actionsshareholder oppressionmanagement deadlocksmanagement compensationdividend payments and buy-outs) can be a thorny issue and can leave a company crippled if not addressed promptly.

      Given the diversity of interests at play, we appreciate that a multi-faceted approach is usually the most cost-efficient method of resolving stakeholder conflicts. Therefore, we provide clients with ready access to an integrated team of lawyers (combining the experience of our corporate, dispute resolution and employment law practices where applicable) who will effectively engage the relevant stakeholders in discussions on how best to resolve their differences amicably.

      More often than not, clients are able to avoid costly protracted court proceedings and resolve stakeholder conflicts with discretion and expediency.