CNPupdates

The legal pulse of Asia in your hands.

Featured authors

Tan Min-Li

Equity Partner

Ge Xiaomeng

Partner

Andrew Eng

Associate

Relevant practices

Corporate Advisory >

Corporate >

Corporate Finance And Capital Markets >

CNPupdates

The Securities and Futures (Amendment) Bill 2026: Key Reforms to Support Dual Listings and Market Growth

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

export this article

Introduction

The Securities and Futures (Amendment) Bill 2026 (“Bill”), which seeks to amend the Securities and Futures Act 2001 (“SFA”) to implement the proposed regulatory regime for the Global Listing Board (“GLB”), was passed in Parliament on 7 May 2026. The GLB is a joint initiative by the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited (“SGX”) and the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”), intended to facilitate dual listings on the SGX and the Nasdaq under a streamlined regulatory framework.

Key Amendments in the Bill

(I) New Part 13A

The Bill inserts a new Part 13A into the SFA which empowers the Monetary Authority of Singapore (“MAS”) to make regulations to facilitate a dual‑listing board (“DLB”) set up by SGX and an overseas exchange through a streamlined regulatory framework.

The main amendments are as follows:

  • Power to prescribe duallisting arrangements – To give effect to the streamlined regulatory framework, MAS will be empowered to declare an overseas exchange (such as Nasdaq) as a “prescribed overseas exchange”. MAS may also declare a dual‑listing board set up by SGX (such as the GLB with Nasdaq) as a “prescribed DLB”.
  • Regulationmaking powers – To harmonise potential differences between Singapore’s securities laws and those of the foreign jurisdiction, MAS may make regulations to replace, modify, or disapply certain provisions of the SFA in respect of a prescribed DLB, including offer‑related provisions (to facilitate the use of a single set of offer documents and align Singapore’s offering processes with those of the foreign jurisdiction); and market misconduct provisions (to provide for certain safe harbours for forward-looking statements available in the foreign jurisdiction which are important to facilitate the prescribed DLB).

It should be noted that the regulation‑making powers are subject to safeguards and minimum standards. The new Part 13A sets out the criteria that MAS would consider when deciding whether to prescribe a dual‑listing board, including whether the overseas exchange enhances issuers’ access to liquidity and international investors, and whether the exchange operates in a jurisdiction with securities laws aligned with international standards in areas such as disclosure, enforcement and regulatory co‑operation.

(II) Other Amendments

In addition to the new Part 13A, the Bill makes other amendments to the SFA that apply to all offers generally. The main amendments are as follows:

  • Earlier engagement with retail investors – Issuers will be permitted to disseminate a preliminary prospectus when marketing to retail investors, instead of limiting such dissemination to institutional and accredited investors. This will enable issuers to engage retail investors in Singapore before the registration of the final prospectus. These engagements are subject to safeguards, including that no official offer may be made on the basis of the preliminary prospectus, that the preliminary prospectus must clearly state that its contents are subject to further changes, and that issuers must make reasonable efforts to inform recipients when the final prospectus is available.
  • Treatment of sponsored depositary receipts – For offers of sponsored depositary receipts, the issuer of the underlying securities, rather than the depositary, will be required to register the prospectus. This ensures that investors receive information relating to the issuer rather than the financial institution acting as an intermediary in issuing the depositary receipts.

Our View

By enabling a streamlined regulatory regime for dual listings through the GLB, issuers will face lower regulatory friction, and have better access to global capital and investors. The passing of the new Bill in Parliament against the backdrop of broader efforts to revitalise the local equity market represents a timely and focused recalibration of Singapore’s capital market framework to enhance its appeal to internationally-oriented companies.

GENERAL DISCLAIMER

This article is provided to you for general information and should not be relied upon as legal advice. The editor and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the contents and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents.

related practices

Services related to this article

Swipe right to scroll

service

Corporate Advisory

Every business involves an amalgam of various stakeholders, such as investors, shareholders and directors. Ideally, each of these stakeholders should have a common vision of what is best for the

service

Corporate

Being a corporate lawyer is more than just translating legalese and churning out documents based on clients’ instructions. Our corporate lawyers understand that their role extends far beyond what is

service

Corporate Finance And Capital Markets

Our firm has significant experience advising on a wide range of corporate finance transactions for numerous local and foreign companies across Asia. We offer

Get in touch with the authors.

Our legal team comes decked with deep insights and the necessary legal expertise; all ready to help you with your legal needs.

Get in touch
Equity Partner

Tan Min-Li

Partner

Ge Xiaomeng

Associate

Andrew Eng

How can CNP help?

We're ready to assist with your legal needs. Please share more details about the nature of your enquiry for us to better serve you.

Subscribe for CNPupdates!

No spam. Just timely legal insights to help you navigate Asia's ever evolving legal landscape.