Date Published: 8 April 2022
Authors: Jimmy Yap and Lai Zheng Yong.
Just one year after Law no.11 of 2020 on Job Creation (Omnibus Law) passed, the Indonesian Constitutional Court (the “Court”) decided on 25 November 2021 that the Omnibus Law was “conditionally unconstitutional” on legislative procedural grounds. This ruling comes after much political pressure from activist groups and trade unions who have condemned the bill from the beginning. This is the first ruling of its kind. The Omnibus Law was intended to intensify Indonesia’s economic attractiveness to foreign investors.
The court has set a deadline of 2 years for lawmakers to ‘redo’ the legislative process and rectify the Law. While the court has not expressly said what is meant by “redoing the legislative process” it is assumed the Government would need to go through the entire law-making process from scratch.
Until the law has been rectified, the Government is to refrain from issuing new implementing regulations of the Omnibus Law. However, if the Government fails rectify the error, the Omnibus Law will become permanently unconstitutional by 26 November 2023.
What now?
All current provisions in the law and its implementing regulations remain valid for two years or until the revision is issued (whichever is sooner). The law only becomes void if the Government and lawmakers fail to ‘redo’ the law by 26 November 2023.
The Court’s ruling does not have retroactive effect. This means that decisions based on the Omnibus Law between the period 25 November 2021 and 26 November 2023, will remain in effect even if the law becomes void on 26 November 2023.
President Jokowi has publicly said that the Government respect the Court’s ruling. They are aiming to rectify the Omnibus Law within time frame given by the Court. He further reassured that the current provisions of the Omnibus Law are still in effect, and provided certainty and safety to business for their current investment under the Omnibus Law.
Despite Jokowi’s promises, the ruling leaves much uncertainty for investors. It is expected that some investors may adopt a ‘wait and see’ attitude in the short term due to the unclear nature of the Court’s ruling but we believe most investors are assured of the government’s clarifications. There is also the possibility of fresh legal challenges against the Omnibus Law arising as there is still ongoing political scrutiny. However, given the rosy economic outlook, there may be opportunity costs if one delays its decision to invest in Indonesia.
Disclaimer: This update is provided to you for general information and should not be relied upon as legal advice. The editor and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the contents and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents.
Every business involves an amalgam of various stakeholders, such as investors, shareholders and directors. Ideally, each of these stakeholders should have a common vision of what is best for the company. However, this is rarely the case when individual interests are factored into the equation.
Stakeholder conflicts (regarding issues such as breaches of fiduciary duties, derivative actions, shareholder oppression, management deadlocks, management compensation, dividend payments and buy-outs) can be a thorny issue and can leave a company crippled if not addressed promptly.
Given the diversity of interests at play, we appreciate that a multi-faceted approach is usually the most cost-efficient method of resolving stakeholder conflicts. Therefore, we provide clients with ready access to an integrated team of lawyers (combining the experience of our corporate, dispute resolution and employment law practices where applicable) who will effectively engage the relevant stakeholders in discussions on how best to resolve their differences amicably.
More often than not, clients are able to avoid costly protracted court proceedings and resolve stakeholder conflicts with discretion and expediency.
